When it comes to personality types, the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) is one of the most well-known and widely used tools. One of the 16 personality types identified by the MBTI is ISFJ, which stands for Introverted, Sensing, Feeling, and Judging. However, within the ISFJ type, there are two subtypes: ISFJ-A and ISFJ-T. But which one is more common? Let’s explore this question from different perspectives.
ISFJ-A vs ISFJ-T: Which Personality Type is More Common?
Definition of ISFJ-A and ISFJ-T
Before we dive into the comparison, it’s essential to understand what ISFJ-A and ISFJ-T mean. The “A” and “T” in these subtypes stand for “Assertive” and “Turbulent,” respectively. According to 16personalities.com, ISFJ-A individuals are “assertive, calm, and confident” and tend to be “better at handling stress and are more resistant to negative emotions.” On the other hand, ISFJ-T individuals are “turbulent, self-conscious, and sensitive to stress” and tend to “experience a wide range of emotions and may struggle with self-doubt and worry.”
Statistics on ISFJ-A and ISFJ-T
When it comes to statistics, there’s not much data available on the distribution of ISFJ-A and ISFJ-T. However, based on the research conducted by 16personalities.com, which collected data from over 40,000 individuals, the ISFJ personality type is the most common among women, accounting for 19% of the female participants. In contrast, it’s the third most common among men, accounting for 8% of the male participants. However, the research did not differentiate between ISFJ-A and ISFJ-T.
Career Choices
According to Truity.com, both ISFJ-A and ISFJ-T individuals share similar traits, such as being responsible, dependable, and detail-oriented. Therefore, they are often drawn to similar career choices, such as healthcare, education, and social work. However, ISFJ-T individuals tend to have a more significant fear of failure and may struggle with decision-making, making them less likely to pursue leadership roles.
Interpersonal Relationships
ISFJ-A and ISFJ-T individuals may approach interpersonal relationships differently. ISFJ-A individuals tend to be more confident and assertive, making them more likely to voice their opinions and preferences. In contrast, ISFJ-T individuals may be more sensitive to rejection and may avoid confrontation. However, both subtypes value loyalty, harmony, and empathy in their relationships.
Conclusion
In conclusion, there’s no clear answer to which ISFJ subtype is more common. However, based on the limited data available, it’s safe to say that ISFJ is a relatively common personality type, particularly among women. Both ISFJ-A and ISFJ-T individuals share similar traits, making them ideal for similar career choices. However, ISFJ-T individuals may struggle more with decision-making and self-doubt. When it comes to interpersonal relationships, both subtypes value loyalty and empathy, but ISFJ-A individuals may be more assertive in expressing their opinions.
Keywords: personality types, ISFJ, ISFJ-A, ISFJ-T, statistics, career choices, interpersonal relationships.
不懂自己或他人的心?想要进一步探索自我,建立更加成熟的关系,不妨做下文末的心理测试。平台现有近400个心理测试,定期上新,等你来测。如果内心苦闷,想要找人倾诉,可以选择平台的【心事倾诉】产品,通过写信自由表达心中的情绪,会有专业心理咨询师给予你支持和陪伴。
isfj-t和enfj-t在性格上有所不同,但并非不配。以下是具体的分析:
1. isfj-t,即内向、感性、理性、目标多变的isfj类型,他们通常在社交场合中显得安静但也不失外向。他们更偏向于细致周全的计划和稳定的价值观,喜欢通过实际的行动来表达自己的情感。
2. enfj-t,即外向、感性、理性、目标多变的enfj类型,他们通常在社交场合中表现出热情洋溢的特点。他们更偏向于直觉和基于人际关系的情感,喜欢通过与他人交流来表达自己的情感。
尽管这两种类型在性格特点上有所不同,但他们也有共同之处。例如,他们都是温柔、关心他人的人,都关注他人的情感和需求。同时,他们在表达情感和价值观方面也有相似之处。因此,从理论上讲,他们有可能相互理解、支持和配合。
然而,这并不意味着所有isfj-t和enfj-t都会相互吸引或适合在一起。因为每个人的个性和生活经历都是独特的,所以他们是否配对还要考虑到具体的情况。
国内外社交平台涌现不少以MBTI人格类型命名的群组,网友们制作的各种人格类型的表情包相继出圈。
Chances are you’ve taken the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, or will. Roughly 2 million people a year do.
你很有可能已经做过MBTI测试了,或正要做。每年约有200万人进行这一测试。
什么是MBTI?
MBTI的全称是,Myers–Briggs Type Indicator,迈尔斯-布里格斯类型指标,它是由美国作家伊莎贝尔·布里格斯·迈尔斯(Isabel Briggs Myers)和她的母亲凯瑟琳·库克·布里格斯(Katherine Cook Briggs)共同制定的一种人格类型理论模型。
MBTI是一种自我报告式的人格测评工具,用以衡量和描述人们在获取信息、作出决策、对待生活等方面的心理活动规律和不同的人格类型表现。
Isabel Myers (1897-1980) and her mother, Katharine Cook Briggs (1875-1968), developers of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator instrument, shared a vision. They wanted to enable individuals to grow through an understanding and appreciation of individual differences in healthy personalities and to enhance harmony and productivity in diverse groups.
Isabel Myers和她的母亲Katharine Cook Briggs是MBTI的开发者。她们都希望通过理解和欣赏健康人格中的个体差异来促使个人成长,并提高不同群体的和谐和生产力。
MBTI测试尝试分配四个类别:内向(Introversion)或外向(Extroversion)、实感(Sensing)或直觉(Intuition)、思考(Thinking)或情感(Feeling)、判断(Judging)或感知(Perceiving)。
取各类别的首字母,就可以得出测试的结果,如“INFP”、“ESFJ”......四个维度的不同偏好排列组合,便形成16种人格类型。MBTI十六型人格测试结果分为4个大类,包括分析家、外交家、守护者和探险家。
MBTI为什么火了?
MBTI为何受到欢迎?普遍认为,MBTI以“科学测试”和“职业建议”为基础,并且有着标准的测量体系,故而被赋予了较强的可信度。加之,MBTI通过一类人的生命轨迹描绘出一组人格画像,更加生动的同时,也便于传播。
《纽约时报》表示,MBTI的持久流行是因为人们喜欢参加考试:
The NY Times recently suggested the enduring popularity of the MBTI is because people like to take the test: “part of its appeal may be that regular people just like taking it.”
《纽约时报》最近表示,MBTI火爆是因为人们喜欢参加考试:“可能是人们喜欢做小测试”。
很多人能够以此为坐标,来认识并分析自己的性格表现。记住朋友的MBTI,正在成为一种新的社交礼仪。有网友甚至研究出了MBTI配对表。
“本人ENFP,在线找一个INFJ贴贴”
“我是ISFJ,ESFP在哪里?听说我们很互补。”
“我觉得ISFJ的人很好哎,能照顾别人。”
“INFJ,我居然和柏拉图是一种类型。!”
……
同时,MBTI 实际上已被证明可以作为在工作组和团队中开始有关个性问题的对话的方法。
A 2009 study of “1,630 people working in 156 teams in a Swedish industrial organization” concluded that MBTI personality profiles could be “a vehicle for group members to gain a better understanding of each other” because it gives them something to talk about.
2009 年一项针对“一家瑞典工业组织156个团队中的1630名员工”的研究得出结论,MBTI性格概况可以“让团队成员更好地了解彼此”,因为这让他们有话题聊。
除此之外,MBTI爱好者们还热衷于分析各种公众人物的类型,以获得与他们的链接,满足自我认同感。前几天,#谷爱凌的MBTI是INTJ#上了热搜。
在一档采访里,谷爱凌说:“我是INTJ,我知道我是内向的人,但是我还能学习怎么更好地去跟其他人交流,如果我没有很多的能量,我可能会感觉有点累,因为我没办法把我的公众人物,把我的外向的自己表达出来,我更想一个人在屋子里高高兴兴地学习,学物理,写作文。”
测试结果显示,“INTJ”代表特征是“理智”“独立”“有规划”。于是全网的INTJ都开始陷入狂欢:“我和谷爱凌是一种类型的人诶!”
科学还是玄学?
当然也有不少人对MBTI半信半疑,提出了对其科学性的质疑。其实,尽管MBTI测试在企业中已经备受青睐,但心理学学术界尚未对其表示认可。
Despite the far-reaching use of the assessment in organizations, the academic psychological community has been slow to embrace it.
尽管MBTI测试在企业中已经备受青睐,但它尚未得到心理学学术界的认可。
No major journal has published research on the MBTI, which academics consider a strong repudiation of the test’s authority.
目前还没有主流期刊发表有关MBTI的研究,学者们认为这是对该测试权威性的强烈否定。
牛津大学教授埃姆雷解释说,与其他性格测试不同,MBTI的吸引力在于它是“非评判性的”,意味着所有的结果都是积极的,对缺点闭口不提。
事实上,人很容易相信一个抽象的一般性的人格描述,并认为它特别适合自己并准确地揭示了自己的人格特点,即使内容空洞,这就是心理学中的“巴纳姆效应”。MBTI是主观的,里面的选择都是基于自我认知,在测试中不可避免地会加入一部分理想人格,促使人们从他们所做的和已经做过的事情中寻找价值。
Barnum Effect refers to our tendency to think that the information provided about our personalities is about us regardless of its generalisability.
“巴纳姆效应”是指我们倾向于认为所提供的关于我们个性的信息是关于我们的,而不管其普遍性如何。
“世界上个体数十亿,难道只有十六种完全一样的人格吗?”
MBTI测试本身,只是一个帮助我们更好的认识和了解自我的工具,没有一种类型是对还是错。人们本身的多元和复杂,是再精确的量表都无法衡量的。所以万万不可将测试结果奉为圭臬,阻碍自己不断尝试的脚步。
实习生:陆昱颖
声明: 我们致力于保护作者版权,注重分享,被刊用文章因无法核实真实出处,未能及时与作者取得联系,或有版权异议的,请联系管理员,我们会立即处理,本站部分文字与图片资源来自于网络,转载是出于传递更多信息之目的,若有来源标注错误或侵犯了您的合法权益,请立即通知我们(管理员邮箱:daokedao3713@qq.com),情况属实,我们会第一时间予以删除,并同时向您表示歉意,谢谢!
本站内容仅供参考,不作为诊断及医疗依据,如有医疗需求,请务必前往正规医院就诊
祝由网所有文章及资料均为作者提供或网友推荐收集整理而来,仅供爱好者学习和研究使用,版权归原作者所有。
如本站内容有侵犯您的合法权益,请和我们取得联系,我们将立即改正或删除。
Copyright © 2022-2023 祝由师网 版权所有
邮箱:daokedao3713@qq.com